Grape varieties ripen at slightly different times and in Matakana, this occurs between late March and late April. The decision as to when to pick is determined initially by taste and examination of the berry pips and bunch stems, backed up by measurements of sugar and acid levels in the fruit. These are based on juice analysis from a randomly selected sample of berries. The acid in grapes drops as sugar rises, and the rate of each is determined by the weather. Because we want to avoid too much or too little of either, the winegrower’s skill is in deciding exactly when both are optimal.
When this occurs the grape picker’s skill comes into play. Many local people have worked at grape picking for some years now, so there is a pool of experienced grape pickers in the district. Picking is not as simple as it may seem – selecting the right bunches and discarding those which are either “second set” (unripe), or have signs of rot, is not always obvious and takes skill and judgement. The bunches are picked into small bins then transported to the winery.
The processing procedure depends upon whether the grapes are white or red. The colour in red wine comes entirely from grape skins, which along with the pips contribute flavour and the tannins. These are essential to give red wine its structure and stability so the red juice, pulp, pips and skins are all kept together. White wine is a more delicate beverage, so skins, pips and pulp are discarded and only the juice is fermented.
At this point, the winery workers really get going. Bunches are fed into a de-stemmer/crusher, a machine which removes the stems then crushes the berries. This produces a slurry of juice, skins, pips and pulp, called “must”. Red must is pumped directly into a large open-topped fermenting tank. White grapes are also de-stemmed and crushed, but white must is then pumped into the wine press. This allows the “free run” juice to drain, then squeezes the skins and pulp to extract the remaining juice.
The must can then be inoculated with yeast. Put simply, fermentation is the consumption of grape sugar by yeast, the main product of which is alcohol. During fermentation the winery workers need to be continuously monitoring the progress of the ferments in a range of ways, adding yeast nutrient if necessary, adjusting refrigeration temperature on white wine tanks so the must stays relatively cool, and regularly “plunging” or “pumping over” the red tanks to keep the raised cap of skins moist and healthy, and to assist colour extraction from the skins.
This means hard and unrelenting physical work, right through the night for the three to five days which it typically takes a red must to complete fermentation, and for very long hours during the remaining weeks of the vintage period. There is no family or social life for the winery worker at this time of year – cellar hands are wedded to their ferments!
None of this acknowledges the biochemical magic which happens when grape juice becomes wine – but maybe the explanation of such magic is best left to Plato, who said around 2400 years ago: Nothing more excellent or valuable than wine has ever been granted by the Gods to man. Amen to that.
[ add comment ] ( 17 views ) | permalink |




( 3 / 523 )North Rodney has experienced huge change in recent years. Some of this has been driven by the emergence of the wine industry, which has been partly responsible for bringing more visitors to the district. Visitors come from far and wide: a survey undertaken at Ransom Wines during February this year indicated that one third of our visitors were from overseas.
We know there may be some ambivalence amongst residents about the desirability of tourists flooding the area, and this is understandable. But there is no doubting the contribution they make to the economic well-being of North Rodney.
Consider the impact of the wine industry on the local economy; a Matakana Winegrowers Inc. survey in mid-2006 indicated there are more than 100 full-time-equivalent jobs in the local wine industry. But in addition to employment opportunities, visitors who come to sample the local wines spend a good deal of money on other products and services - food, activities, accommodation etc.
So it is clear people are coming to the Matakana region because of the reputation of the wines – just as they visit Burgundy, Bordeaux, and the Barossa Valley to try the local wines. And when people visit those regions they are seeking a local experience – local stories and local wines. When you go to Burgundy you don’t expect to be offered wine from Bordeaux.
We are starting to see in Matakana some of the features of established wine regions around the world. For example, we now have a fine wine centre in Matakana Village, “The Vintry”, where you can taste all the Matakana wines; Heron’s Flight performs an educational role with informal talks and a printed guide to the wine region; and many of the excellent local accommodation establishments are opting to provide local wines and regale their guests with local wine lore.
These are signs of a region starting to take pride in its unfolding wine heritage and to acknowledge the economic importance of its wine industry. Meantime, by the time you read this we will all be well into the wonderful but crazy annual event called vintage……
[ add comment ] ( 17 views ) | permalink |




( 3.1 / 497 )The wine business is highly competitive, both in New Zealand and around the world. We hear talk of “wine lakes” in the big European wine producing countries, and thousands of tonnes of grapes have been left on the vines in Australia in recent years because there is no market for them.
Wine lakes and unpicked grapes are in part symptoms of more discerning wine drinkers and a declining global demand for cheap wine. We have avoided this problem in New Zealand by producing wines at the premium end of the market, but this does not prevent the importation of European and Australian wines. This puts pressure on New Zealand producers, because for a variety of reasons – cool climate growing conditions, weather vagaries, high labour costs, absence of government agricultural subsidies, and economies of scale, we are unable to produce wine cheaply.
The answer for New Zealand winegrowers has been to get into the export game ourselves. Between 1996 and 2006 the volume of wine exported increased from 11 to 58 million litres – more than 500% increase. During the same period, wine imports into New Zealand increased by about 70% - the rest of the world seems to want our wines much more than we want theirs!
As with other New Zealand regions, wine exports from Matakana have also increased enormously in recent years. Talk to any of the seven or eight local winegrowers who export and you will hear stories about how enthusiastically Matakana wines are received around the world. Matakana-grown Bordeaux-blend reds are being consumed in top-end restaurants in New York, London, and Sydney amongst other places, and our pinot gris and chardonnay wines are exported to a wide range of countries in Europe, Asia and North America.
The Antipodean and Providence have been exporting for the longest time, but Matakana Estate is by a substantial margin the largest producer and exporter of wine in Matakana. Other Matakana wineries currently exporting are Brick Bay Wines, Hawk’s Nest Orchard, Hyperion Wines, Ransom Wines and Takatu Vineyard.
Robin Ransom
robin@ransomwines.co.nz
Originally published in Mahurangi Matters, March 2007
[ add comment ] ( 9 views ) | permalink |




( 3.1 / 438 )These days there is considerable public concern about environmental damage from careless farming practices, and awareness of the need to farm more sustainably. So it is understandable that people feel concerned when they see sprays being used in vineyards.
Most vineyard spraying involves use of products which are relatively benign in the environment, indeed many are acceptable for organic farming regimes. Most protect vines against fungal diseases – black spot, downy mildew, powdery mildew, and various forms of bunch rot. A whole new range of horticultural sprays has been developed in recent years involving use of natural control agents, generally bacteria or other fungi, which either attack the harmful fungi or move into their ecological niche and prevent them from developing.
All chemical sprays are subject to MRLs – Maximum Residue Limits, which are readily measurable in wine, and legally enforceable. MRLs restrict the amount of such sprays winegrowers can use, and the times they can use them, ie- not to be used within a certain number of days before harvest.
In addition, New Zealand Winegrowers, the statutory industry body which all winegrowers must belong to, has in recent years established an organization called Sustainable Winegrowing New Zealand. Winegrowers are not obliged to belong to this body but currently 60% of New Zealand’s vineyard area belongs and is accredited to SWNZ.
SWNZ was developed to provide a “best practice” model of environmental care in the vineyard, to promote responsible behaviour in terms of the well-being of staff, neighbours and the community, and to guarantee better quality assurance from vineyard to bottle. SWNZ places stringent restrictions on the use of agrichemicals and addresses issues such as soil health and water quality. Members are audited on their compliance, and failure to comply results in loss of accreditation.
Even without restrictions and regulations winegrowers know that in order to compete in a crowded world wine market we all need to manage our vineyards as closely as we can to New Zealand Winegrowers’ motto “the riches of a clean green land”.
Robin Ransom
President, Matakana Winegrowers Inc.
robin@ransomwines.co.nz
Originally published in Mahurangi Matters, February 2007
[ add comment ] ( 9 views ) | permalink |




( 3 / 375 )What has become known in the trade as “The Wither Hills Debacle” has important implications for winegrowers and wine consumers everywhere.
Because this featured in the national news for days on end last month most readers will know what it is about. Briefly, the Wither Hills wine company produced two quite different sauvignon blanc wines but labeled them identically. One of them, of which there was a very small amount available, secured a top ranking in a Cuisine magazine wine tasting. The other, which comprised the vast bulk of all the wine with this label, was not entered in the Cuisine competition.
It is important to point out that there was no quality issue in either case. By all accounts, both wines were of good quality. However, this is not the point, and whether or not Wither Hills did this deliberately is also not the point. The issue is that wine consumers have a right to expect that every bottle they buy of a wine with an identical label will be identical wine – especially when claims of superiority are made by way of medals or trophies or whatever.
Some Matakana winemakers choose to enter wine shows and others do not, and our reasons for deciding one way or the other are many and varied. However, wine buyers who purchase a Matakana-grown wine which has a medal sticker attached can be more confident that every bottle they buy will be identical, because none of us make large enough batches of wine to cause the problem Wither Hills faced. They produce such a large volume of sauvignon blanc that it is difficult for them to blend the various components into a single batch before bottling.
What this event has highlighted is the fallibility of the wine show system, and the potential for corrupt practise which it allows. It is now up to the organisers of wine shows to take steps to ensure this sort of duplicity cannot happen again.
[ add comment ] ( 16 views ) | permalink |




( 3 / 460 )
Random Entry



